|
Crash Accountability Study
Cost and Concerns Outweigh Benefits
Recently a truck driver driving through Cincinnati collided with a bridge that had collapsed across the interstate directly in his path. Fortunately the driver survived but both he and his motor carrier will have this event on their CSA record for a few years. The trucking industry has petitioned the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration to remove from consideration any non-preventable crashes when calculating the CSA Crash Indicator.
The recently released Crash Weighting Analysis report finds these main objections:
| • Police accident reports do not generally contain enough information to reliably ascertain driver and motor carrier responsibility. |
| • Modifying the Crash Indicator does not appear to improve its ability to predict future crash rates. |
| • Both time and cost factors are prohibitive. The costs have been estimated between $4 and $11 million annually and the length of time it would take to process the information would make the determination questionable for use given the rolling 24 month analysis period in CSA. |
The study clearly reinforces FMCSA’s prior statements about the issue of crash weighting although they have stated that this is not a final decision and more study may be needed. A comment period is open until February 23, 2015. [Docket No. FMCSA-2014-0177]
To the north, in Canada, they solved the problem of insufficient data by instituting a national crash report which contains data fields directly aimed at determining the critical reason for a crash and how the individual drivers contributed to the event.
Changing the crash reports of all 50 states is not something that can be done simply or quickly. However, even though FMCSA may want to use this study to avoid the issue, the motor carrier industry should use the conclusions to craft a workable plan to overcome the objections and eventually include crash weighting as part of CSA.
|
Recent Comments