|
In 2012 Congress passed the Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century Act (MAP-21) highway funding bill. Contained in that bill was a mandate that the DOT finalize a regulation requiring electronic on board recorders for hours of service. The deadline was October, 2013. The Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA) has announced that it will not be able to meet that deadline. It is expected that in September the agency will publish a supplemental notice of proposed rulemaking outlining their plans to publish a final rule a year later. According to FMCSA the regulation will probably become mandatory two years later in 2016.
|
|
|
|
|
In announcing this, FMCSA Administrator Anne Ferro called this timeline “optimistic” since the rulemaking process is lengthy. Adding to the complexities is the fact that the prior EOBR rule was overturned by a court challenge. In crafting the upcoming final rule FMCSA will have to take into account the previous challenge which was based on the potential that the recorders could be used to harass drivers.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Another mandate in MAP-21 is that FMCSA finalize training standards for new truck drivers. In 2007 the agency published a proposed rule that would have required 120 hours of training, most of that behind the wheel. After much criticism the agency decided not to move ahead and withdrew the proposal.
FMCSA held a listening session at the Mid America Truck Show in Louisville. The truck drivers who spoke at that session were in agreement that a training period of 2-3 weeks was far too short. Some mentioned a training period as long as 6 months, including on the road time with another driver. There was a strong sentiment voiced that this on the road time should not be spent running team since the “instructor” would spend a great deal of time in the bunk and be unavailable to monitor and mentor the student driver.
Training school representatives were concerned about a possible accreditation reguirement which could potentially be costly and involve another government agency, the Department of Education. Another concern was the effect that a rigid time based curriculum would have on the quality of training. Some schools felt that a results based curriculum would produce a better quality student since they couldn’t move on to the next step until they had mastered the previous one.
All in all this will prove to be an interesting situation as it develops.
|
Recent Comments